Madri
| Madri | |
|---|---|
 A print on Madri by Raja Ravi Varma | |
| Personal Information | |
| Spouse | Pandu |
| Children | Sons
Step-sons (Kunti)
|
| Relatives | Shalya (brother) |
| Origin | Madra |
Madri (Sanskrit: माद्री, IAST: Mādrī) is a princess from the Madra Kingdom mentioned in the Hindu epic, the Mahabharata. She became the second wife of Pandu, the king of the Kuru Kingdom, and was the mother of the twins Nakula and Sahadeva, the youngest of the five Pandava brothers who play a central role in the epic.
Madri was also the sister of Shalya, and her marriage to Pandu was arranged by Bhishma, the elder of the Kuru dynasty. Following a curse placed upon Pandu, which would lead to his death if he engaged in intimate relations, Madri accompanied him in his self-imposed exile, along with Pandu's first wife, Kunti. With Pandu's consent and Kunti's divine assistance, Madri invoked the twin deities Nasatya and Darsa, collectively known as the Ashvins, receiving their blessing and subsequently giving birth to her sons, Nakula and Sahadeva.
Madri was renowned for her beauty and is described in the epic as being exceptionally attractive; as a result, Pandu one day succumbed to desire and attempted to make love to her, which led to his death due to the curse. Overcome with remorse and grief, Madri entrusted her sons, Nakula and Sahadeva, to Kunti’s care and chose to jump into Pandu's funeral pyre, joining him in death.
Name and epithets
[edit]Indologist Monier Monier-Williams explains that the Sanskrit feminine name Mādrī is derived from Madra (lit. 'joy' or 'happiness'), the name of her native kingdom in the northwestern Indian subcontinent. Therefore, Mādrī means 'princess of Madra'.[1]
Madri belonged to the Bahlika clan, which originated from Bactria in Central Asia. Thus, she is also referred to as Bahliki (Bāhlikī) in few instances in the epic.[2] When Madri is introduced in the narrative, the author of the epic uses the term rūpeṇāsadṛśī, which means 'unparalleled in beauty,' to describe her.[3]
Literary background
[edit]Madri is a character of the Mahabharata, one of the Sanskrit epics from the Indian subcontinent. The work is written in Classical Sanskrit and is a composite work of revisions, editing and interpolations over many centuries. The oldest parts in the surviving version of the text may date to near 400 BCE.[4]
The Mahabharata manuscripts exist in numerous versions, wherein the specifics and details of major characters and episodes vary, often significantly. Except for the sections containing the Bhagavad Gita which is remarkably consistent between the numerous manuscripts, the rest of the epic exists in many versions.[5] The differences between the Northern and Southern recensions are particularly significant, with the Southern manuscripts more profuse and longer. Scholars have attempted to construct a critical edition, relying mostly on a study of the "Bombay" edition, the "Poona" edition, the "Calcutta" edition and the "south Indian" editions of the manuscripts. The most accepted version is one prepared by scholars led by Vishnu Sukthankar at the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, preserved at Kyoto University, Cambridge University and various Indian universities.[6]
Biography
[edit]Madri is mentioned as an incarnation of a minor goddess named Dhriti ('Endurance').[7] Madri is described being dark complexioned and exceedingly attractive.[8]
Marriage and exile
[edit]Madri was the sister of Shalya, the king of the Madra Kingdom. Bhishma, a prominent statesman of the Kuru Kingdom and the grandsire of the royal family, traveled to Madra to secure Madri's hand in marriage for Pandu, the king of the Kuru Kingdom. Shalya consented, but in accordance with Madra family custom, Bhishma presented him with a dowry, consisting of wealth, gold, elephants, and horses. Bhishma then brought Madri to Hastinapura, the capital of Kuru, where she was married to Pandu.[9][10]
Pandu had a first wife, Kunti, though Madri considered herself superior in lineage and regarded Kunti as her rival. Shortly after his marriage, Pandu embarked on a series of military conquests to expand his kingdom’s influence. Following these successful campaigns, he went to tapovana (forest of austerities) south of Himalayas, accompanied by both his wives, Kunti and Madri. During the expedition in a forest, he observed a pair of deer in the act of coitus and desiring to hunt them, shot arrows at them. Upon approaching, he realized that the deer were, in fact, the sage Kindama and his wife, who had assumed the form of deer to enjoy privacy. As he lay dying, the sage pronounced a curse upon Pandu, decreeing that he would die instantly should he ever engage in sexual relations. Disturbed by the gravity of his actions and seeking repentance, Pandu chose to relinquish his royal duties and live an ascetic life in the forest. Both Kunti and Madri accompanied him in his self-imposed exile. After travelling to various pilgrim sites, they settled in the Shatashringa forests under the care of sages who lived there.[9][11]
Birth of Nakula and Sahadeva
[edit]
Kunti, the first wife of Pandu, possessed a mantra granted by the sage Durvasa prior to her marriage, which allowed her to summon any deity of her choice and bear a child by them. She had kept this boon a closely guarded secret. During his exile, Pandu, hindered in fulfilling his religious duties due to his lack of an heir, discussed the matter with Kunti, urging her to "raise offspring in this time of distress." He cited six types of sons as recognised by religious doctrines, with an additional six types in a supplementary list. At this juncture, Kunti disclosed her boon, though she initially resisted using it. Only after Pandu’s fervent pleas did Kunti invoke her boon, resulting in the birth of her three sons—Yudhishthira, Bhima, and Arjuna—each fathered by a different god chosen by Pandu after an interval of one year each.[12] When Pandu requested Kunti to bear more children, Kunti firmly refused, stating that doing so would diminish her dignity and reduce her to the status of a prostitude.[9][10]
Madri, in a private moment with Pandu, expressed that she felt overshadowed by Kunti, as her position seemed secondary to Kunti’s in both Pandu’s affections and household dynamics, a feeling intensified by Madri’s awareness of her own superior birth. She conveyed her grief over being childless and requested that Pandu seek Kunti’s assistance to allow her to become a mother. However, Madri was hesitant to approach Kunti directly, referring to her as her 'rival'. Upon Pandu's request, Kunti generously shared the boon with Madri, who invoked the twin-gods, the Ashvins, to beget Nakula and Sahadeva at once. The Kaunteyas (lit. 'sons of Kunti') and Madreyas (lit. 'sons of Madri') are raised together in the hermitage, and they are collectively referred to as the Pandavas.[9]
After some time, Madri, through Pandu, asked Kunti for the assistance to bear more children. However, Kunti firmly refused the request, expressing her frustration by noting that Madri had "deceived" her by using a single mantra to gain two sons. She voiced her regret, fearing that Madri might end up with more children than herself, and admitted she would have also summoned the Ashvins to obtain twins had she known. Concluding her response, Kunti insisted that Pandu "not come to [her] again" with requests to give Madri the mantra.[10]
Death
[edit]
During springtime in the forest of Shatashringa, Pandu was affected by the atmosphere's intensity. One day, while walking alone with Madri in this setting, Pandu saw her in translucent clothes and succumbed to desire. Despite Madri’s repeated protests, Pandu embraced her, forgetting the curse placed upon him by the sage Kindama, which forbade him from intimate relations on penalty of death. The curse took immediate effect, and Pandu fell dead in Madri’s arms.[12] Upon Pandu’s death, Madri cried out in sorrow, summoning Kunti but asking her to come alone, leaving the children behind. Kunti, seeing Pandu and Madri together, questioned how Madri allowed him to be alone with her, given the curse. Madri explained that despite her resistance, Pandu’s overwhelming desire fulfilled the curse's terms. Kunti sorrowfully noted that Madri was "fortunate" to have seen Pandu's face radiant in intimacy—a moment Kunti herself had never experienced[10][9] Following this, Kunti, as the senior wife, claimed the religious duty to accompany Pandu in death, believing it her responsibility to follow him to the afterlife. She asked Madri to relinquish his body and take on the task of raising their children.[9] In the Southern recension of the Mahabharata, Pandu's death occurred on the day of Uttara Phalguni Nakshatra, coinciding with Arjuna's birthday.[3]
Madri, however, resisted Kunti’s request, stating that she felt bound to Pandu by an unfulfilled union, as he had approached her in desire at the time of his death. Madri expressed her wish to follow Pandu into the afterlife to fulfill his desire,[13] also fearing she might not be able to raise Kunti’s children with equal dedication and affection. She appealed to Kunti to care for her own children, Nakula and Sahadeva, in her absence, trusting in Kunti’s ability to provide for them impartially. During Pandu's funeral, Madri jumped into Pandu's burning pyre, thus performing the act of sati.[note 1][10][9][13][15]
However, this account is contradicted by the very next stanza, which states that her dead body and that of her husband were handed over by sages to the Kaurava elders in Hastinapura for the funeral rites.[16]
Assessment
[edit]Assessments emphasize Madri’s renowned beauty and high status as a princess of Madra, which are presented as surpassing Kunti’s, though the latter is depicted as possessing a stronger personality and more respected qualities.[9][3] According to scholar Pradeep Bhattacharya, Madri’s charms and physical appeal allowed her to win Pandu’s favoritism, as seen when he grants her the freedom to choose her divine partner without the restrictions that were earlier imposed on Kunti.[10] However, author Debalina Roychoudhary notes that Madri’s beauty alone does not secure her an empowered position within the family or the narrative. Instead, it makes her the cause of Pandu's death and sets her apart as an object of desire. This contrasts her with Kunti, who plays the vital role of a guardian or guide, with Pandu often consulting only her, excluding Madri.[9]
The theme of rivalry and jealousy between the wives is also noted.[3][17] While discussing her desire for children with Pandu, Madri affirms that Kunti is her rival and does not shy away from expressing her sensitivity in seeking Kunti's favour.[3] According to Roychoudhary, Madri consistently feels overshadowed by Kunti, and her sense of inferiority and pain is fueled by her belief that she is equal to or even exceeds Kunti in some ways. Roychoudhary argues that Madri’s decision to summon the Ashwini Kumaras for two children instead of one was motivated by a desire to match Kunti’s contributions to the family lineage and to alleviate her own feelings of inadequacy.[9] Bhattacharya points out that Kunti expresses resentment over Madri’s ability to outmaneuver her, particularly at the moment of Pandu’s death when she finds Madri in his arms. This is further evident when Kunti, feeling betrayed by Madri's use of her generosity to outdo her in the number of children, refuses to share her mantra again.[10][3] However, Madri finally accepts Kunti's nobility before her death, acknowledging her resilience and leadership. Bhattacharya sees Madri’s recognition of Kunti as a tribute to her own limitations, reflecting her lack of the “firmness of will” needed to rise above rivalry and ego.[10] Roychoudhary praises Madri for her honesty and having the courage to openly express her rivalry with Kunti while simultaneously admitting Kunti's superiority.[9]
Bhattacharya positions Madri within a broader pattern of dependent female characters in the Mahabharata, such as Ambika, Ambalika, and Gandhari, who conform to social or marital expectations. This is in contrast to a different class of characters called the kanyas, like Kunti, Draupadi, and Satyavati, who are powerful figures with great influence in shaping the narrative of the epic. He argues that Madri’s dependence on her husband and adherence to societal ideals culminate in her decision to commit sati (self-immolation) after Pandu’s death—a traditional act that highlights her lack of autonomy and her acceptance of her role as a “female counterpart” rather than an independent individual. Her death, while a sacrifice, reinforces her role as a secondary figure, in contrast to Kunti, who survives and cares for both Madri’s children and her own.[10] According to mythologist Devdutt Pattanaik, this distinction is also reflected in the roles played by Madri’s and Kunti’s children, as the three Kaunteyas play far more important roles than the twins.[18]
Sati
[edit]Madri’s sati (the act of immolation of a widow on her husband's funeral pyre) has been studied by scholars as a way to gain insights into the practice of sati during the ancient epic period. However, her case stands out as an exceptionally rare instance in the Mahābhārata, where most widows—aside from a few in later-added chapters—do not perform sati.[19][15][20] Traditionally, it is believed that Madri committed sati by mounting Pandu’s funeral pyre, based on a specific verse (1.117.28) from the Mahābhārata. Yet a subsequent verse (1.117.30-31), found in all manuscript traditions, offers an alternative account. In this version, after Pandu’s death, sages bring both Pandu’s and Madri’s bodies to Hastinapura for proper funeral rites, contradicting the claim that Madri perished with Pandu on the pyre. Nilakantha, a prominent 17th-century commentator on the Mahābhārata, tried to reconcile these conflicting verses by suggesting that the word "sarīra" (typically meaning "body") in the second verse actually refers to "asthi" (bones or remains). By this interpretation, Madri did indeed immolate herself with Pandu, and the “bodies” brought to Hastinapura were, in fact, their ashes or remains, not their intact corpses. This interpretation, while considered the most compelling explanation, has not gained widespread acceptance.[16][20]
While the scene is included in the Critical Edition of the Mahābhārata, V. S. Sukthankar, the General Editor of the Critical Edition, expressed his dissatisfaction with Nilakantha’s interpretation, drawing on the views of Edward Washburn Hopkins. Although Sukthankar did not explicitly argue that the verses were spurious, he acknowledged the internal contradictions and the challenge of reconciling the two accounts. Building on Sukthankar and Hopkins, scholar M. A. Mehendale contends that the conflicting accounts are due to textual conflation from an interpolation, where an external narrative was inserted into the text without consideration for internal consistency. He rejects Nilakantha’s explanation and, based on internal and external evidence, suggests that the verses regarding Madri’s self-immolation are likely spurious.[16] Devdutt Pattanaik argues that such inconsistencies reflect later cultural and textual interpolations during the medieval period. Pattanaik points to further contradictions in Mahābhārata episodes, such as the account of Krishna’s death, where some of his wives perform sati while others choose asceticism, and other episodes in which widows, like those of the Kauravas or figures from the other epic Ramayana like Tara and Mandodari, do not immolate themselves. These discrepancies suggest that later writers may have modified the scenes to reflect medieval values that promoted widow immolation as a mark of honor and loyalty. Regarding the alternative account, Pattanaik suggests that if Madri’s body was indeed delivered to Hastinapur, it is likely she died immediately alongside Pandu due to the curse placed on him by Kindama, since Pandu's arrows had killed both the sage and his wife.[20]
Notes
[edit]- ^ The critical edition of the Mahabharata presents a brief exchange between Kunti and Madri, after which it simply states that "the daughter of the king of the Madras, Pandu’s revered wife, followed the noble one onto his funeral pyre." In contrast, the Southern Recension offers additional details, describing how the sages and the "foremost Brahmanas" attempted to dissuade both Kunti and Madri from their intent to perform sati.[14]
References
[edit]- ^ Monier-Williams, Sir Monier (1999). A Sanskrit-English Dictionary: Etymological and Philologically Arranged with Special Reference to Cognate Indo-European Languages. Asian Educational Services. ISBN 978-81-206-0369-1.
- ^ White, David Gordon (7 May 1991). Myths of the Dog-Man. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-89509-3.
- ^ a b c d e f g Telidevara, Dr Lakshmi (19 February 2021). "Madri Of Mahabharata: The Forgotten Mother Of The Twins - Indic Today". Retrieved 15 November 2024.
- ^ Brockington, J. L. (1998). The Sanskrit Epics. Brill Academic. p. 26. ISBN 978-9-00410-260-6.
- ^ Minor, Robert N. (1982). Bhagavad Gita: An Exegetical Commentary. South Asia Books. pp. l–li. ISBN 978-0-8364-0862-1. Archived from the original on 16 April 2023. Retrieved 28 June 2020.
- ^ McGrath, Kevin (2004). The Sanskrit Hero: Karna in Epic Mahabharata. Brill Academic. pp. 19–26. ISBN 978-9-00413-729-5. Archived from the original on 16 April 2023. Retrieved 28 June 2020.
- ^ Brodbeck, Simon; Black, Brian (9 August 2007). Gender and Narrative in the Mahabharata. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-11994-3.
- ^ Walker, Benjamin (9 April 2019). Hindu World: An Encyclopedic Survey of Hinduism. In Two Volumes. Volume I A-L. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-62465-0.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Roychowdhury, Debalina (20 December 2019). Into the Myths: A Realistic Approach Towards Mythology and Epic. Partridge Publishing. ISBN 978-1-5437-0576-8.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i Bhattacharya, Pradip. ""One-in Herself" Why Kunti Remains a Kanya" (PDF). Manushi India Organization. Retrieved 10 January 2013.
- ^ Ramankutty, P.V. (1999). Curse as a motif in the Mahābhārata (1. ed.). Delhi: Nag Publishers. ISBN 9788170814320.
- ^ a b www.wisdomlib.org (28 January 2019). "Story of Pāṇḍu". www.wisdomlib.org. Retrieved 12 November 2024.
- ^ a b Doniger, Wendy (March 2014). On Hinduism. OUP USA. ISBN 978-0-19-936007-9.
- ^ Sharma, Arvind (1988). Sati: Historical and Phenomenological Essays. Motilal Banarsidass Publ. p. 25-26. ISBN 978-81-208-0464-7.
- ^ a b Sagar, Krishna Chandra (1992). Foreign Influence on Ancient India. Northern Book Centre. ISBN 978-81-7211-028-4.
- ^ a b c M. A. Mehendale (1 January 2001). Interpolations In The Mahabharata. pp. 200–201.
- ^ Karve, Irawati (July 2006). Yuganta: The End of an Epoch. Orient Longman. ISBN 978-81-250-1424-9.
- ^ Pattanaik, Devdutt (2010). Jaya: An Illustrated Retelling of the Mahabharata. Penguin Books India. ISBN 978-0-14-310425-4.
- ^ Hawley, John Stratton (8 September 1994). Sati, the Blessing and the Curse: The Burning of Wives in India. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-536022-6.
- ^ a b c Devdutt.com (17 March 2024). "Maybe Madri Did Not Commit Sati?". Devdutt Pattanaik. Retrieved 14 November 2024.
External links
[edit]
